Showing posts with label Open House. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Open House. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
5 Reasons to Loosen Rules for Investors & Underwater Owners
A plan to jump-start housing
By Jack Guttentag
Inman News™
Share This Editor's note: This is the third in a three-part series.
Previous articles in this series argued that, absent a liberalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lending terms, a second round of home-price declines was very likely. Renewed price declines would have a devastating effect on homeowners and the economy, and would also increase Fannie and Freddie losses on both old and new loans.
This makes the liberalization of lending terms a requirement of responsible conservatorship.
The changes needed include a rollback of risk-based price adjustments to where they were before the financial crisis, and relaxation of misguided underwriting rules.
Previous articles focused on the need to modify rigid affordability rules, eliminate income documentation requirements for sterling borrowers, and eliminate the requirement for property appraisals on purchase transactions. This article identifies a few more.
Liberalize lending terms and remove restrictions on loans to investors
Investors buy houses to resell or to rent rather than to occupy. During the go-go years, investors bought houses to resell at a profit, and in the current depressed market they are buying houses either to sell or to rent until the market improves.
Laurie Goodman has shown how important investors are to restoring a supply-and-demand balance in the current market. The problem is that there are fewer investor loans now, when we need them, than there were before the crisis -- when we didn't need them.
The major barrier to additional home purchases by investors is the onerous rules imposed on investor loans by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In September 2006, Fannie Mae charged 1.5 to 2.5 points extra if the borrower was an investor rather than an occupant, and investor loans could be up to 90 percent of property value. Today, the price increment is 1.75 to 3.75 points, and the maximum loan is 85 percent of property value.
Fannie and Freddie also limit the number of loans that any one investor can have to four, with up to 10 allowed under more restrictive lending terms. This restriction has the effect of limiting the home investor market to small players.
The higher prices, lower maximum loan-to-value ratios, and limits on the number of loans an investor can have are all counterproductive in the current environment. Investor activity would be stimulated if 90 percent loans were available at a 1 point price increment and limits on loan numbers were eliminated. When home prices start rising by more than 3 percent a year, the old rules could be reimposed.
Eliminate LTV and appraisal requirements on HARP loans
The Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) was designed to make refinance possible for underwater borrowers who are current on their payments and whose loans are owned by Fannie or Freddie. A major problem with the program is a maximum loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of 125 percent, which cuts out a sizable segment of the potential market for no good reason.
I can see why the agencies might have limited the program to borrowers with LTVs above 125 percent. The net loss to the agencies from refinancing is lower for high-LTV loans than for lower-LTV loans because high-LTV loans are more likely to default and lower interest rates will prevent some of these defaults.
The loss to the agencies from refinancing underwater mortgages is the interest loss on loans that would have remained in good standing had the refinance not occurred. This loss is not related to the LTV. The benefit to the agencies is the loss avoided on loans that would have defaulted but don't because of the rate reduction. This benefit is larger for higher-LTV loans, which are more likely to default.
By scrapping the LTV maximum in the HARP program, the agencies would also be eliminating the need for appraisals, which would simplify the program and expedite the implementation.
Concluding comment
There are many more changes in Fannie and Freddie rules that would help to generate increased housing demand, but my internal editor says that more examples are not needed. The overriding need is recognition by the agencies and its conservator that assets are not conserved by acting as if Fannie and Freddie are small lenders with no power to affect the market.
These entities are a major part of the market, and their assets are best conserved by policies that convert the currently anemic market into a healthy one. Once that principle is accepted, I will be happy to flesh out the list, and so will many others.
The author, Jack Jack Guttentag, is professor of finance emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
By Jack Guttentag
Inman News™
Share This Editor's note: This is the third in a three-part series.
Previous articles in this series argued that, absent a liberalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lending terms, a second round of home-price declines was very likely. Renewed price declines would have a devastating effect on homeowners and the economy, and would also increase Fannie and Freddie losses on both old and new loans.
This makes the liberalization of lending terms a requirement of responsible conservatorship.
The changes needed include a rollback of risk-based price adjustments to where they were before the financial crisis, and relaxation of misguided underwriting rules.
Previous articles focused on the need to modify rigid affordability rules, eliminate income documentation requirements for sterling borrowers, and eliminate the requirement for property appraisals on purchase transactions. This article identifies a few more.
Liberalize lending terms and remove restrictions on loans to investors
Investors buy houses to resell or to rent rather than to occupy. During the go-go years, investors bought houses to resell at a profit, and in the current depressed market they are buying houses either to sell or to rent until the market improves.
Laurie Goodman has shown how important investors are to restoring a supply-and-demand balance in the current market. The problem is that there are fewer investor loans now, when we need them, than there were before the crisis -- when we didn't need them.
The major barrier to additional home purchases by investors is the onerous rules imposed on investor loans by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In September 2006, Fannie Mae charged 1.5 to 2.5 points extra if the borrower was an investor rather than an occupant, and investor loans could be up to 90 percent of property value. Today, the price increment is 1.75 to 3.75 points, and the maximum loan is 85 percent of property value.
Fannie and Freddie also limit the number of loans that any one investor can have to four, with up to 10 allowed under more restrictive lending terms. This restriction has the effect of limiting the home investor market to small players.
The higher prices, lower maximum loan-to-value ratios, and limits on the number of loans an investor can have are all counterproductive in the current environment. Investor activity would be stimulated if 90 percent loans were available at a 1 point price increment and limits on loan numbers were eliminated. When home prices start rising by more than 3 percent a year, the old rules could be reimposed.
Eliminate LTV and appraisal requirements on HARP loans
The Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) was designed to make refinance possible for underwater borrowers who are current on their payments and whose loans are owned by Fannie or Freddie. A major problem with the program is a maximum loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of 125 percent, which cuts out a sizable segment of the potential market for no good reason.
I can see why the agencies might have limited the program to borrowers with LTVs above 125 percent. The net loss to the agencies from refinancing is lower for high-LTV loans than for lower-LTV loans because high-LTV loans are more likely to default and lower interest rates will prevent some of these defaults.
The loss to the agencies from refinancing underwater mortgages is the interest loss on loans that would have remained in good standing had the refinance not occurred. This loss is not related to the LTV. The benefit to the agencies is the loss avoided on loans that would have defaulted but don't because of the rate reduction. This benefit is larger for higher-LTV loans, which are more likely to default.
By scrapping the LTV maximum in the HARP program, the agencies would also be eliminating the need for appraisals, which would simplify the program and expedite the implementation.
Concluding comment
There are many more changes in Fannie and Freddie rules that would help to generate increased housing demand, but my internal editor says that more examples are not needed. The overriding need is recognition by the agencies and its conservator that assets are not conserved by acting as if Fannie and Freddie are small lenders with no power to affect the market.
These entities are a major part of the market, and their assets are best conserved by policies that convert the currently anemic market into a healthy one. Once that principle is accepted, I will be happy to flesh out the list, and so will many others.
The author, Jack Jack Guttentag, is professor of finance emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
320 Chestnut Ave - Woodlynne NJ
This home is the perfect opportunity to become a homeowner/invester. Open House Sunday 10-11-2009 1-4pm.
10 Reasons to BUY THIS Home:
1. As a homeowner you get a mortgage less than what you might pay for rent.
2. You get to write off the interest on your loan each year...money back that you wouldn't get as a renter.
3. If this is your first home, you are eligible for the first time homebuyer tax credit.
4. You can decorate it any way you choose.
5. You will live on a quiet street with great neighbors.
6. You will have your own front and back yard for entertaining
7. You will be near transportation for easy commutes to Philadelphia, North Jersey, AC or NY.
8. You will have a home to call your own and have a legacy to leave your family.
9. When you decide to purchase your next home, you can rent it out for positive cash flow...or
10. You can sell it in the future and make a profit.
PS. The first phase clean out is complete and the interior painting is in progress.
10 Reasons to BUY THIS Home:
1. As a homeowner you get a mortgage less than what you might pay for rent.
2. You get to write off the interest on your loan each year...money back that you wouldn't get as a renter.
3. If this is your first home, you are eligible for the first time homebuyer tax credit.
4. You can decorate it any way you choose.
5. You will live on a quiet street with great neighbors.
6. You will have your own front and back yard for entertaining
7. You will be near transportation for easy commutes to Philadelphia, North Jersey, AC or NY.
8. You will have a home to call your own and have a legacy to leave your family.
9. When you decide to purchase your next home, you can rent it out for positive cash flow...or
10. You can sell it in the future and make a profit.
320 Chestnut Ave OPEN HOUSE
Sunday, OCTOBER 11, 2009
1pm - 4pm
(2BR Row Town Home w/Hard wood floors/Formal DR/Basement/front & back yards)
If this date does not work for you, Call Clara for an appointment -
856-264-1058
PS. The first phase clean out is complete and the interior painting is in progress.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Weekend Open House Bargains
WHY RENT WHEN YOU CAN OWN?
320 Chestnut Woodlynne, NJ
Sat September 19, 2009
11am - 1pm
2 Bedrooms/ 2 level Colonial style RTC w/basement
Formal Dining Room
Partially Finished Basement/Unfinished portion utility room
Hardwood floors
Fenced Front and Back Yards
ONLY $85,000
206 Mercer Ave - Gloucester City, NJ
Sat September 19, 2009
2pm - 4pm
4 Bedrooms/1 Bath
3 level Colonial SFR
Double lot
Views of bridge
Walking distance to waterfront
Seller open to ALL OFFERS - Make one!
If you can not make these dates and times,
Call Clara 856-264-1058 for an appointment
Labels:
2 bedroom,
4 Bedrooms,
bargains,
Gloucester City,
home sales,
new jersey,
Open House,
woodlyne
Sunday, July 19, 2009
OPEN HOUSE- 21 Willis Ave Cherry Hill Sunday 7/19 1-4pm
OPEN HOUSE
21 Willis Ave Cherry Hill NJ
Sunday 1-4pm
http://www.21willis.com/
Call Clara - 856-264-1058
I turn real estate dreams into reality - One home at a time!
Be sure to find out what homes are worth in your neighborhood or in the neighborhood you want to live in. Click the link to the right!!!
21 Willis Ave Cherry Hill NJ
Sunday 1-4pm
- 3 Bedrooms
- 2 Baths
- Colonial
- Formal Dining Room
- Updated kitchen
- Family Room
- Deck
- Enclosed front porch
- Basement and stand up attic
- Pool
- All appliances and most pool equipment included
Come check out the featured property! This property is built for summer fun and enjoyment. It is affordably priced at $219,900, with lower taxes. You get the Cherry Hill school system and an updated home. Don't miss it! Easy access to transportation. Drop by today. Near the Cherry Hill Mall.
You may qualify to use part of the $8000 Tax Credit upfront to purchase this home. Ask me about other special financing programs with low on NO downpayment.
http://www.21willis.com/
Call Clara - 856-264-1058
I turn real estate dreams into reality - One home at a time!
Be sure to find out what homes are worth in your neighborhood or in the neighborhood you want to live in. Click the link to the right!!!
Labels:
2 baths,
3 bedroom,
Cherry Hill Home,
Family Room,
Home for Sale,
Open House,
Pool,
Sunday
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)